h.
HUHU.fr
LEAD GENERATION
February 13, 20262 min read

Leads.io Review: Pricing and Alternatives 2026

LucieHUHU.fr Editor

Discover our Leads.io 2026 comparison: pricing, reviews and alternatives for your lead generation.

Leads.io Review: Pricing and Alternatives 2026

Leads.io is an international lead generation player. Founded in 1999 in the Netherlands, the company has established itself as a benchmark in the pay-per-lead model through its proprietary technology and transparent approach. Here is our analysis of this solution, its pricing, and available alternatives in 2026.

Leads.io Company Profile

NameLeads.io
Founded1999 (first website in 2000)
Founder / CEOTim Roemer
HeadquartersNetherlands
ModelCPL (Pay-per-lead)
SectorsMulti-sector B2C and B2B
CountriesInternational

History and Positioning

Leads.io was founded in 1999 by Tim Roemer, at a time when lead generation still relied on paper lists. The first website was launched in September 2000, with the goal of connecting businesses to customers via a pay-per-lead model.

Today, Leads.io has become a globally recognized tech-enabled lead generation agency. The company has formed a strategic partnership with Egeria, a Dutch investment fund present in the Netherlands, USA, and DACH region.

The executive team includes:

  • Tim Roemer — CEO and founder
  • Anzhelika Belova — CFO and COO
  • Koen Verhoeff — Global Managing Director
  • Sjoerd Knol — CIO

Solutions Offered

Pay-Per-Lead Model

Leads.io operates on a model where clients only pay for leads generated. No setup fees, no fixed monthly fees.

Proprietary Technology

The company relies on internally developed technology and proprietary media brands to generate qualified leads.

Multi-Channel Acquisition

Leads.io deploys campaigns across all digital channels:

  • Meta (Facebook, Instagram)
  • Google Ads
  • TikTok
  • Native Ads

Pricing

Leads.io operates on a CPL (pay-per-lead) model. Prices vary according to industry sector, qualification level, and desired volumes.

Strengths ✅

  • 25+ years of experience (since 1999)
  • Pay-per-lead model (no fixed fees)
  • Proprietary technology
  • International presence
  • Partnership with Egeria (investor)

Lead Provider Comparison Table

Provider Founded Headquarters Model Sectors
Yacla - France CPL Multi-sector B2C
Leads.io 1999 Netherlands CPL Multi-sector
Dolead 2013 Paris CPL Multi-sector
Hipto 2016 Boulogne-Billancourt CPL Insurance, Telecom, Energy
MVF Global 2009 London CPL Tech, SaaS, Multi-sector

Leads.io Alternatives

Yacla

Yacla is a qualified B2C lead provider. Fixed pricing agreed upfront, exclusive leads delivered to your CRM.

Dolead

Dolead specializes in intent-based leads since 2013. Proprietary technologies and international presence (France, USA).

Hipto

Hipto is the French leader in lead generation with a 10-20% transformation rate. Present in France, Spain, and Italy.

MVF Global

MVF Global is an international player with 210+ media brands and 148 million monthly visitors.


Sources: Leads.io, Leads.io — About Us

About the Author

Lucie

HUHU.fr Editor

Everything you need to know about telephony for your sales teams. We strive to provide as many articles as possible to support your commercial growth.

Articles in Lead Generation

Duplicate, resold or already-worked lead: how to detect duplicates before burning out your sales teams
leads

Duplicate, resold or already-worked lead: how to detect duplicates before burning out your sales teams

A duplicate lead is not just two CRM rows. It consumes sales time, tires the prospect and blurs provider performance measurement.

Sep 20, 20265 min
Speed to lead: what SLA should you set between form submission, qualification, and first call to maximize contact rate
leads

Speed to lead: what SLA should you set between form submission, qualification, and first call to maximize contact rate

Speed to lead is not just about calling fast. To convert, teams need an SLA that reflects intent level, qualification depth, calling window, and real sales capacity.

Sep 8, 20267 min
B2B intent data: which signals should you use to prioritize call leads without losing compliance?
leads

B2B intent data: which signals should you use to prioritize call leads without losing compliance?

Not every intent signal deserves a priority call. In B2B, the strongest signals connect recency, request context, role relevance, and traceable provenance to a concrete sales action.

Sep 2, 20267 min
How to Build a Lead Provider Scorecard That Procurement, Marketing, and Sales Actually Accept
leads

How to Build a Lead Provider Scorecard That Procurement, Marketing, and Sales Actually Accept

A strong lead provider scorecard does not compare price alone. It aligns compliance, traceability, delivery, CRM integration, and sales performance so procurement, marketing, and sales can make the same decision.

Aug 26, 20266 min
CRM, call center, and provider: what data should be shared to handle a lead better from the first ring?
leads

CRM, call center, and provider: what data should be shared to handle a lead better from the first ring?

Between the lead provider, the CRM, and the call center, not every field should circulate. Here are the fields that actually help before the first ring without turning compliance into operational noise.

Aug 24, 20266 min
Insurance, energy, telecom leads: should reachability be evaluated the same way across sectors?
leads

Insurance, energy, telecom leads: should reachability be evaluated the same way across sectors?

No, reachability should not be read the same way in insurance, energy, and telecom. In 2026, teams need to connect callback speed, proof of opt-in, collection context, and sector-specific distrust.

Aug 22, 20268 min

Protect your numbers now

Monitor your number reputation and anticipate blocks before they impact your conversions

Leads.io Review: Pricing and Alternatives 2026 | HUHU.fr